Function Dashboard
The Function Dashboard provides organisational transparency and accountability for data quality across the enterprise.
Every Source Message within CryspIQ® is assigned:
- A Data Steward
- A Business Function
- Data Quality Rules
- Ownership responsibilities
This allows organisations to clearly understand where data quality issues originate, who is responsible and how individual business functions are performing.
The dashboard provides visibility into:
- Data Quality exceptions
- Business function performance
- Data Steward accountability
- DAMA quality dimensions
- Organisational trends
- Areas requiring remediation
Overview
CryspIQ® follows a fundamental principle:
Data must be fixed at source.
CryspIQ® does not clean, modify or repair source data during processing.
When incoming data fails a Data Quality Rule:
- The record is identified.
- The record is loaded into the Data Quality Exemption table.
- The issue becomes visible in the dashboard.
- The responsible Data Steward investigates.
- The source system is corrected.
- The corrected record is re-pushed.
- The exemption is automatically resolved.
This approach ensures accountability remains with the data owner.
Quality Monitoring Process
Push Data
↓
Data Quality Rules
↓
Pass?
↓
YES
↓
Continue Processing
NO
↓
DQ Exemption Table
↓
Function Dashboard
↓
Data Steward Investigation
↓
Fix at Source
↓
Re-Push Data
↓
Exemption Resolved
Why the Function Dashboard Exists
Many organisations struggle to answer:
- Which business area owns the issue?
- Who is responsible?
- How serious is the problem?
- Is quality improving or declining?
- Which functions require support?
The Function Dashboard makes ownership visible.
This drives:
- Accountability
- Transparency
- Better governance
- Continuous improvement
Dashboard Overview
The Function Dashboard provides several views.
Function League Table
Provides a ranking of business functions based on data quality performance.
This creates organisational transparency by allowing functions to compare performance.
Example:
| Rank | Business Function | Quality Score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Finance | 98% |
| 2 | Human Resources | 96% |
| 3 | Procurement | 92% |
| 4 | Operations | 89% |
| 5 | Sales | 85% |
The objective is not competition.
The objective is visibility and accountability.
Data Quality Heatmap
The Heatmap provides a visual representation of data quality issues across the organisation.
The heatmap aligns to the DAMA Data Quality Dimensions.
Areas with higher issue volumes are highlighted and can be investigated further.
This allows administrators and business leaders to quickly identify:
- High-risk areas
- Emerging trends
- Persistent issues
- Governance weaknesses
DAMA Data Quality Dimensions
CryspIQ® categorises Data Quality Rules against DAMA dimensions.
| Dimension | Description |
|---|---|
| Completeness | Required data exists |
| Validity | Data conforms to business rules |
| Accuracy | Data correctly represents reality |
| Consistency | Data is consistent across systems |
| Timeliness | Data is available when required |
| Uniqueness | Duplicate records are avoided |
| Integrity | Relationships between data are maintained |
The Heatmap helps organisations understand which dimensions are creating the most issues.
Business Function Ownership
Every Source Message is assigned to a business function.
Examples include:
Finance
Human Resources
Operations
Sales
Marketing
Procurement
Customer Service
This ownership model ensures accountability for data quality remains with the business.
Data Steward Accountability
Each Source Message is also assigned a Data Steward.
The Data Steward is responsible for:
- Monitoring quality issues
- Investigating root causes
- Working with source system owners
- Coordinating remediation activities
- Ensuring issues are resolved
The dashboard provides visibility into steward performance and outstanding issues.
Data Quality Exemptions
When a record fails a Data Quality Rule, it is recorded in the Data Quality Exemption table.
Examples include:
Missing Customer Name
Invalid Date of Birth
Invalid Product Classification
Duplicate Customer Record
Invalid Cost Centre
The exemption remains visible until the issue is resolved.
Fix at Source Principle
CryspIQ® does not allow data cleansing during processing.
This is a core governance principle.
Incorrect Approach
Poor Source Data
↓
Clean During Processing
↓
Load
This hides the underlying issue.
CryspIQ® Approach
Poor Source Data
↓
Identify Issue
↓
DQ Exemption
↓
Fix Source System
↓
Re-Push Data
↓
Load
This creates long-term improvements in enterprise data quality.
Automatic Resolution
When corrected data arrives:
- CryspIQ® identifies the original exemption.
- The exemption is marked as resolved.
- The issue drops from dashboard reporting.
- Quality metrics automatically improve.
No manual intervention is required.
This creates a self-healing governance process.
Investigating Data Quality Issues
When issues appear in the dashboard:
Step 1 – Review the Business Function
Identify which function owns the data.
Step 2 – Review the Assigned Data Steward
Determine who is responsible for remediation.
Step 3 – Review the Failed Rule
Identify the specific Data Quality Rule that failed.
Step 4 – Review the Source Message
Determine which source process introduced the issue.
Step 5 – Identify the Root Cause
Common causes include:
- Missing mandatory fields
- Invalid values
- Incomplete records
- Source system defects
- Process failures
Step 6 – Fix the Data at Source
Work with the source system owner to correct the issue.
Step 7 – Re-Push the Corrected Data
Once corrected, push the data again and monitor resolution.
Common Root Causes
Incomplete Records
Mandatory information is missing.
Examples:
Date of Birth
Gender
Country
Business Function
Product Classification
Invalid Data
Data does not conform to expected formats.
Examples:
Invalid Email Address
Invalid Phone Number
Invalid Date Format
Duplicate Records
Multiple records represent the same business object.
Missing Context
Required contextual information has not yet arrived.
These issues may also appear within the Parking Lot dashboard.
Monitoring Best Practices
Daily
Review:
- New exemptions
- High-risk functions
- Critical rule failures
Weekly
Review:
- Function rankings
- Steward performance
- Quality trends
Monthly
Review:
- DAMA Heatmap trends
- Governance performance
- Continuous improvement opportunities
Benefits of the Function Dashboard
The Function Dashboard helps organisations:
- Improve accountability
- Increase transparency
- Strengthen governance
- Measure stewardship performance
- Identify systemic issues
- Improve data quality culture
- Support regulatory compliance
- Build trust in reporting and analytics
Related Guides
Next Steps
- Review business function performance.
- Investigate Data Quality exemptions.
- Work with Data Stewards.
- Fix issues at source.
- Re-push corrected data.
- Monitor automatic resolution.
- Review DAMA quality trends.
The Function Dashboard provides the transparency and accountability required to build a sustainable enterprise data quality culture and continuously improve data quality across the organisation.